Cancer Treatment Strategy-An Overview
Dibyajyoti Saha*1, Tarashankar
Maity2, Mayukh Jana3 and Supradip Mandal3
1School of Pharmacy, Chouksey Engineering College. Lal Khadan,
Masturi Road, Bilaspur-495004, C.G.
2Calcutta Institute of
Pharmaceutical Technology and A.H.S., Howrha-711316, W. B, India.
3Bharat Technology, Banitabla, Uluberia,
Howrah-711316
*Corresponding Author
E-mail: saha.dibyajyoti@gmail.com
ABSTRACT:
Cancer
is any disorder of cell growth that results in invasion and destruction of
surrounding healthy tissues by abnormal cells, which have arisen from normal
cells, whose nature is permanently changed. The exact mechanism through which a
normal cell is transform to a tumor cell is still not clear and is considered
as very complex in nature comprising of several steps though in recent years
considerable advancement in knowledge have been obtained in molecular
mechanisms, growth regulatory factors, environmental effects, diet and food
habits etc. Tumors that remain localized can usually be cured by surgery or
radiotherapy even when enormous. Cancer, still regarded as the most progressive
and dreadful disease, is posing a great social and economical problem globally
since it has been estimated that in the year 2005 about 10.9 million new cases
have been registered while about 6.7 million people had died from cancer while
the respective figures for Indian people might be about 1 million of new
incidences and 6 lakh of deaths. Data from USA showed
that an estimated death of about 5.5 lakh had
occurred in 20051. The
number of new cancer cases is also increasing globally at a fast rate.
KEYWORDS: Radiotherapy, Chemotherapy, Alkylating
agents, HDAC inhibitor, Proteasome inhibitors, Telomerase inhibitor, Antiangiogenic drugs, COX-2 inhibitors.
INTRODUCTION:
In
the treatment of cancer, one of the basic assumptions is that all malignant
cells should be destroyed, removed or neutralized to achieve cure. With
experimental animal tumors, it has been proved that a single tumor cell can
grow and eventually kill the host2.
Four
major therapy modalities exist today which can be used in attempt to bring
about the requisite malignant cellular reduction as
(A)
Surgery
(B)
Radiotherapy
(C)
Chemotherapy
(D)
Immunotherapy and other biology therapy.
Cancer
can be classified into (I) solid tumors and (II)
hematological malignancies. In solid tumors, surgery and radiotherapy are the
traditional primarily chosen treatments though several cancer chemotherapeutic
drugs are also being used now a days. In hematological
malignancies, chemotherapy is the treatment of choice at diagnosis.
Strategy of cancer treatment:
Surgery
is considered as the oldest treatment for cancer and until few decades of this
century was the only treatment modality that could cure patients particularly
when the disease was localized. The modern era of elective surgery for visceral
tumors began in frontier America in 1809 when E. MacDowell removed a large
ovarian tumor from a patient. However, after the introduction of general ether
anesthesia in 1846 by Dr. J. Warren and principle of antiseptics by J. Lister
in 1869 respectively surgical oncology was greatly increased. W.S. Halsted
elucidated the principles of en block resections for cancer as exemplified by
his development of the radical mastectomy in 1890 followed by radical
prostatectomy in 1904 by H.H. Young and radical hysterectomy in 1906 by Dr. E.
Wertheim. Developments in the technical surgery continue at a rapid pace and
modern technical innovations are continuing to extend significantly the
surgeon’s reach into a variety of areas including the most difficult and
distant parts of the body3.
Surgical
removal has obvious advantages and disadvantages. Once a block of tissues has
been removed it can do no harm in a specimen container but equally well there
can be no direct effect of surgery due to its local and regional applications.
Recurrence of the disease often results due to distant metastasis. Hence other
treatment modalities particularly radiotherapy and chemotherapy are being practiced
simultaneously as pre- and post-operative therapy.
(B)
Radiotherapy :
This
is considered as the second main and oldest method of treatment. After the
discovery of X-rays by William Conrad Roentgen on 8 November, 1895 the first
application of X-rays for therapeutic purpose was made in a female patient in
the treatment of her breast cancer on January 29, 1896. Antoine Henri Becquarrel on 1st march 1896 subsequently discovered gamma
radiation. The first case of cure of a malignant tumor by radiotherapy alone
was reported when a female patient received 150 radiations over 9 months for
the treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of her nose
in 1899. In mid–1930s, radiotherapy was beginning to be used as an adjuvant to
radical mastectomy. With the introduction in the 1950s of 6oCo and 137Cs
as sources of therapeutic radiation and the developments of betatrons
and linear accelerators, the ability to provide an adequate target dose
avoiding at the same time undesirable side-effects was greatly improved. This
was the beginning of modern radiotherapy. It is often recognized that some
tumors like Wilm’s tumor, Hodgkin’s disease, neuroblastoma etc are sensitive and show good response to
the radiotherapy even with exposure with low degree radiations4.
There
are certain disadvantages as (1) Radiotherapy has no direct action on distant
tumors and is used as local therapy. (2) The therapeutic dose may also damage
and kill the adjoining normal tissues. (3) It cannot be applied to the sites
which are very susceptible and sensitive to radiation damage. (4) Some bulky
and solid tumors do not respond to radiotherapy. (5) There are hazards
including development of secondary neoplasms in
radiation treatment etc.
However,
with the development of modern delivery techniques like the availability of
newer radiation sources including computer assisted dosimetry,
improved tumor localization using computer topography, some of these
disadvantages have been controlled to some extent and radiation has become more
selective and is becoming popular in the treatment and control of many cancers.
At
the turn of this century, cancer was regarded as a disease that began locally
and that spread progressively to the regional lymph nodes and only at a late
stage via the blood streams to distant parts of the body. After the
introduction of radiotherapy in the 1930s this form of local treatment was also
added to the therapeutic armamentarium. Many cancers metastasize by the
bloodstream at an early stage and patients may die from metastatic disease even
though the primary sites remains free of tumor by the combination of treatment
modalities as surgery and radiotherapy. Attempts at chemical treatment of
cancer were recorded5 as long ago as the first century A.D. It is of
interest that colchicine, prepared from the bark of
the cinchona tree, was first used as an anticancer
agent. The implications of the observation6 that soldiers dying in
the First World War after exposure of yellow mustard gas had aplasia of lymphoid organs and bone-marrow were only
appreciated some 20 years later after the confirmation of the Krumbharrs’ observation by the two renowned scientists
namely Goodman and Gilman. The first ever-successful drug nitrogen mustard was
introduced into clinical practice in the treatment of lymphomas and leukemias from 1946 onwards.
It
triggered search for new anticancer agents and a variety of sources have been
explored through random screening of thousands of synthetic chemicals,
microbial products, plant and animal extracts and various other sources. Within
1960, a series of anticancer compounds were developed and tested on
transplantable tumors in rodents. These are still playing important roles in
the control of a number of cancers. It is interesting that many effective drugs
were discovered in research programmes that had
little or no relation to cancer7. While the alkylating
agents originated from chemical warfare, antimetabolite
drugs came from nutritional and antimicrobial research or the investigation of
nucleic acid metabolism.
(i) Alkylating agents:
The
alkylating agents are anti-tumor drugs that act
through the covalent bonding of alkyl groups (one or more saturated carbon
atoms) to cellular molecules. Historically, the alkylating
agents have played an important role in the development of cancer chemotherapy.
The nitrogen mustards, mechlorethamine [HN2,
nitrogen mustards] and tris
chloroethyl)
amine [HN3], were the first non hormonal agents to show significant antitumar activity in humans. Some of the commonly used
drugs of various subclasses are described as per Table-13.
Table-1:
Classification of alkylating agents
|
Subclass |
Drugs |
|
Nitrogen
mustards |
Mechlorethamine (HN2), Chlorambucil, Melphalan Cyclophosphamide, Ifosfamide |
|
Nitrosoureas |
Carmustine (BCNU), Lomustine(CCNU),
Semustine (Me-CCNU),
Streptozotocin, Chlorozotocin |
|
Ethyleneimines |
Triethylene melamine (TEM), Triethylene |
|
Alkyl
sulfonates |
Busulfan |
|
Epoxides |
Dibromomannitol, Dibromodulcitol |
|
Dialkyltriazenes |
Dacarbazine (DTIC) |
Chemistry and Mechanism of alkylating reactions:
Traditionally,
alkylating reactions have been classified as SN1
(nucleophilic substitution first-order) or SN2
(nucleophilic substitution, second-order) (Drawing
1). In the SN1 reaction there is an initial formation of a highly
reactive intermediate, followed by the rapid reaction of this intermediate with
a nucleophil to produce the alkylated
product. In this reaction the rate limiting step is the initial formation of
the reactive intermediate. Thus, the reaction exhibits first-order kinetics
with regard to the concentration of original alkylating
agent and the rate is essentially independent of the concentration of the
substrate, hence the designation SN1.
Fig. – 1: SN1 and SN2 reactions
The
SN2 alkylation reaction represents a bimolecular nucleophilic
displacement. The rate of this reaction is dependent on the concentration of
both the alkylating agent and the target nucleophile. Therefore, the reaction follows second-order
kinetics. The term SN1 and SN2 are defined kinetically
but normally are used in reference to the mechanism of action.
(ii) Antimetabolites:
Antimetabolites are agents that interfere with normal metabolism due to their
structural similarity with normal intermediates in the synthesis of RNA and DNA
precursors. They either serve as substrates for enzymes, inhibit enzymes, or do
both. Due to differences in metabolism between normal cells and cancer cells,
several antimetabolites have the potency to act with
a certain degree of specificity on cancer cells.
Table-2:
Classification of antimetabolites
|
Subclass |
Drugs |
|
Folate |
Methotrexate (MTX) |
|
Purine analogues |
6-Mercaptopurine(6-MP),
6-Thioguanine (6-TG),
Azathiopurine |
|
Pyrimidine analogues |
5-FU,
Cytosine arabinoside (Ara
C) |
MTX
blocks folic reductase, 5-FU blocks thymidylate synthetase both in
turn inhibit methylation of deoxyuridylic
to thymidylic acid. 6-MP, 6-TG and also MTX block purine ring biosynthesis. Ara C
inhibits reduction of cytidilic acid to deoxycytidylic acid and also inhibits DNA polymerase. All
these compounds find application in the treatment of several human cancers4.
(iii)
Plant products:
The
plant kingdom has long served as a prolific source of useful drugs in the
treatment of various diseases. The search of anti-tumor agents from the plant
kingdom has been in active pursuit after 1950s but the greatest impetus came
after the discovery of vincristine and vinblastine from Catharanthus roseus around 1960. The folklore knowledge of its hypoglycaemic activity stimulated the investigation of this
plant which ultimately led to the discovery of above active principles. Later
on another semi-synthetic derivative namely vindesine
has been developed. Cancer research has led to a reassessment of many primitive
plant cure and a massive search for the anti-tumor
principles have provided many active products belonging to the following
classes of chemical compounds as diterpenes, lignans, quassinoids, ansamacrolides and alkaloids some of which are listed
below:
Table-3:
Classification of plant products
|
Subclass |
Drugs |
|
Vinca alkaloids |
Vincristine, Vinblastine,
Vindesine |
|
Epidophyllotoxins |
Etoposide (VP-16), Teniposide (VM-26) |
|
Taxol derivatives |
Taxol, Taxotere |
|
Dysoxylum bineclariferum Hook.f.(Meliaceae) |
Flavopiridol |
|
Combretum caffrum
(Eckl.and Zeyh.) |
Combretastatins |
|
Raphanus sativas
L.(Brassicaceae) |
Roscovitine |
|
Aglaila sylvestre |
Sylvestrol |
|
Erythroxylum pervillei |
Pervilleine A |
|
Centaurea schischkinii |
Schischkinnin |
In the massive
screening program, NCI, USA, has played the pioneer role and they have screened
thousands of plant products. Early drugs colchicine, podophyllotoxin, their derivatives and semi-synthetic
products except VM-26 and VP-16 has very limited clinical application.
Quite
recently the introduction of taxol group of compounds
as drugs has led to great interest and boost among scientists and physicians. Taxol obtained from the pacific yew tree Taxus brevifolia
has demonstrated significant activity in patients with refractory cancer
including some solid tumors as ovarian cancer progressing on prior therapy with
cisplatin. Activity has also been shown in advanced breast cancer5.
The anti-tumor
antibiotics are natural products usually derived from fermentation broths
mostly from streptomyces species as per the table-4.
Table: 4 Classification
of anti-Tumor antibiotics:
|
Subclass |
Drugs |
|
Anthracyclins |
Doxorubicin(adriamycin), Daunorubicin |
|
Others |
Actinomycin D, Bleomycin, Mitomycin, Mithramycin |
Most
of the available anti-tumor antibiotics are DNA binders and intercalators.
One of the most unusual structures that has antitumor
activity is bleomycin, a mixture of water-soluble
small molecular-weight peptides isolated from the fungus Streptomyces verticullus. The primary action of bleomycin is to produce single- and double-strand breaks in
DNA. The first anthracyclins put in clinical use are daunomycin and doxorubicin again produced from the Streptomyces species. As anti-tumor agents, they are
matched only by alkylating agents in terms of their
clinical usefulness and both of them find application in the treatment of a
number of malignancies6.
(v) Hormones and related agents:
Beatson introduced excision of endocrine glands to control
human cancer in 1896 but it was not until 1941 when Huggins et al first
reported the dramatic effect of orchiectoimy in man
with cancer of the prostate. In the earlier year, Huggins demonstrated that in
the dog, the shrinkage of the gland and cessation of the secretion followed
castration and that these effects could be reversed by the administration of an
androgen. Effective hormone therapy begun in 1941 with the
treatment of cancer of the prostate with diethylstilbestrol (DES) and with estradiol dipropionate by Herbst.
The early success with hormone therapy led to the
synthesis of a number of new steroids and other related structures with hormone
activity that show less side effects. At the same time it was also felt that it
is futile to hope that hormone therapy alone will ever cure any form of cancer
because relapse of responders inevitably occurs. This may be due to the reason
that hormone-dependent tumors are made up of a heterogenous
cell population that includes cells that are not hormone-dependent. The most
useful adrenocorticosteroid compounds that are used
now a days are prednisone and prednisolone used in
combination with other drugs in the treatment of various lymphomas particularly
Hodgkin’s disease, leukemias etc. Among the antiestrogens and androgens class the commonly used drug is
tamoxifen, which may induce remission upto 30% of postmenopausal women with metastatic
breast-tumors7.
(vi)
Miscellaneous agents:
This group includes those chemical compounds whose
mechanism of action is obscure or whose mechanism of action is different from
the above classes. Some of the examples are described in the table- 5.
Table-5: Classification of miscellaneous agents
|
Subclass |
Drugs |
|
Enzymes |
L-Asparaginase |
|
Metal compounds |
Cisplatin, Carboplatin |
|
Others |
Procarbazine, Hydroxyurea, Hexamethylmelamine
(HMM), Pentamethylmelamine (PMM),
Amsacrine
etc.
|
(D)
Immunotherapy and Biological therapy:
It has been observed that immunologic mechanisms
influence the development and growth of malignant tumors. In contrast to
chemotherapy which follows ‘first order’ kinetics, immunotherapy follows ‘zero
order’ kinetics which indicates that specific number of antibodies would be
required for each tumor cell lysis and thus it is
possible theoretically that all the tumor cells including the last one can be
killed. But it has been found that it can tackle relatively small number of
cells and hence the property of last cell kill can be successfully exploited
only after reducing tumor bulk by other treatment modalities.
Classical immunotherapy of tumor has been attempted for
nearly 100 years without success. Starting from the earlier experiments of Dr.
E. Klein in 1969 on the treatment of human skin cancer by hypersensitivity
reaction yielding encouraging results, this area is rapidly growing. The
concept of immunochemotherapy by drug conjugated with
antibody seem to bring rational approach as this will result in selective tumor
cell kill without affecting the normal cells of the host is gaining popularity.
Until 1980, the absence of purified products of the interferons,
interleukins, tumor necrosis factor (TNF) and other lymphokines,
precluded serious clinical study8.
Gene therapy is a new therapeutic approach in which a
functioning gene is inserted into a cell to correct a metabolic abnormality or
to introduce a new function. It is considered to play a significant role in the
treatment of human cancers in the future years to come. In recent years, a
variety gene therapy approaches are being investigated in a number of
laboratories.
Newer anticancer drugs:
HDAC inhibitor:
Also in recent years, there
has been an effort to develop HDIs as a cancer treatment or adjunct9,
10. The
exact mechanisms by which the compounds may work are unclear, but epigenetic
pathways are proposed11. Richon et
al. found that HDAC inhibitors can induce p21 (WAF1) expression, a regulator of
p53's tumor suppressor activity. HDACs are involved in the pathway by which the
retinoblastoma protein (pRb) suppresses cell
proliferation12. The pRb protein is
part of a complex which attracts HDACs to the chromatin so that it will deacetylate histones13. HDAC1 negatively
regulates the cardiovascular transcription factor Kruppel-like
factor 5 through direct interaction14. Estrogen is
well-established as a mitogenic factor implicated in
the tumorigenesis and progression of breast cancer
via its binding to the estrogen receptor alpha (ERα).
Recent data indicate that chromatin inactivation mediated by HDAC and DNA methylation is a critical component of ERα
silencing in human breast cancer cells15.
Examples:
• Vorinostat was licenced
by the U.S. FDA in October 2006 for the treatment of cutaneous
T cell lymphoma (CTCL).
• Romidepsin (trade name Istodax) was licenced by the US
FDA in Nov 2009 for cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL),
• Panobinostat is under investigation
for various cancers including cutaneous T cell
lymphoma (CTCL).
• Valproic acid is under investigation
for various cancers including leukemia.
• Mocetinostat (MGCD0103) is undergoing
clinical trials for treatment of various cancers (including follicular
lymphoma, Hodgkin lymphoma and acute myeloid leukemia).
Proteasome inhibitors:
Proteasome inhibitors are drugs that
block the action of proteasomes, cellular complexes
that break down proteins, like the p53 protein. Proteasome
inhibitors are being studied in the treatment of cancer.
Examples
• In 2003, bortezomib was the first proteasome inhibitor to be approved for use in the U.S.
• Disulfiram has been proposed as
another proteasome inhibitor.16, 17, 18
• Epigallocatechin-3-gallate has also been proposed.19
• Salinosporamide A has started
clinical trials for multiple myeloma.
Telomerase inhibitor:
Telomerase, the ribonucleoprotein
enzyme maintaining the telomeres of eukaryotic chromosomes, is active in most
human cancers and in germline cells but, with few
exceptions, not in normal human somatic tissues. Telomere maintenance is essential
to the replicative potential of malignant cells and
the inhibition of telomerase can lead to telomere shortening and cessation of
unrestrained proliferation. We describe novel chemical compounds which
selectively inhibit telomerase in vitro and in vivo.
Treatment of cancer cells with these inhibitors leads to progressive telomere
shortening, with no acute cytotoxicity, but a
proliferation arrest after a characteristic lag period with hallmarks of
senescence, including morphological, mitotic and chromosomal aberrations and
altered patterns of gene expression. Telomerase inhibition and telomere
shortening also result in a marked reduction of the tumorigenic
potential of drug-treated tumour cells in a mouse xenograft model.
Examples:
·
Two examples from
this class of compounds, designated BIBR1532 {2-[(E)-3-naphtalen-2-yl-but-2- enoylamino]-benzoic acid} and BIBR1591 {5-morpholin-
4-yl-2-[(E)-3-naphtalen-2-yl-but-2-enoylamino]-benzoic acid}.
Antiangiogenic drugs:
A substance in the body called Vascular Endothelial
Growth Factor (VEGF) is responsible for the growth of new blood vessels. It
promotes this growth by stimulating the endothelial cells, which form the walls
of the vessels and transport nutrients and oxygen to the tissues. Evidence
shows that when the retinal pigment epithelial (RPE) cells begin to wither from
lack of nutrition (a condition called "ischemia"), the VEGF goes into
action to create new vessels. This process is called "neovascularization,"
and it acts as a restorative function in other parts of the body. In the
retina, however, the vessels do not form properly, and leaking results. This
leakage causes scarring in the macula and eventual loss of central vision. Antiangiogenic drugs prevent the VEGF from binding with the
receptors on the surface of the endothelial cells. In most cases, the drugs are
injected into the vitreous of the eyeball, then pass
into the subretinal space, where the vessels
proliferate. Neovascularization is then blocked,
preventing bleeding into the retina.
Macugen (pegaptanib sodium), Lucentis, Tryptophanyl-tRNA synthetase (TrpRS), Combretastatin A4 Prodrug
(CA4P), Avastin (bevacizumab), Sirolimus (rapamycin), Endostatin etc.
COX-2
inhibitors as an Antiangiogenic drug:
The formation of new blood vessels by angiogenesis to
provide adequate blood supply is a key requirement for the growth of many
tumors. While normal blood vessels expressed the COX-1 enzyme, new angiogenic endothelial cells expressed the inducible COX-2.
We evaluated the role of COX inhibitors in the mouse corneal micropocket assay in which angiogenesis is driven by the
addition of a Hydron pellet containing basic
fibroblast growth factor (bFGF). Neovascular
areas were measured with a slit lamp five days after pellet implantation into
the corneal stroma. All animals containing implants
with bFGF (90 ng) developed
intensive areas of neovascularization, whereas the
controls implanted with the Hydron pellet alone did
not. Indomethacin (a nonselective COX-1/COX-2
inhibitor) and SC-236 (a COX-2-selective inhibitor) inhibited angiogenesis in a
dose-dependent manner. Importantly, the indomethacin-treated
mice developed severe gastrointestinal toxicity at the efficacious dose of 3
mg/kg/day. By contrast, gastrointestinal lesions were not observed, and
platelet COX- 1 activity was unaffected, at anti-angiogenic
doses of SC-236 (1–6 mg/kg/day). Furthermore, a COX-1-selective inhibitor,
SC-560, was ineffective at doses up to 10 mg/kg, a dose that completely blocked
platelet COX-1 activity in these mice. SC-236 was also effective in reducing
angiogenesis driven by bFGF, vascular endothelium
growth factor (VEGF), or carrageenan in the matrigel rat model. Finally, in several tumor models,
SC-236 consistently and effectively inhibited tumor growth and angiogenesis.
This novel antiangiogenic activity of COX-2
inhibitors indicates their potential therapeutic utility in several types of
cancer.
CONCLUSION:
The factors which determine specific types of cancer
are age, sex, race, genetic predisposition and the carcinogens exposed to the
environment. A number of chemicals have been clearly shown to be carcinogenic
e.g. Tobacco smocks, benzene & some of its
derivatives and some dyes as seen in animal tests. Whether may be the cause or
the site, it is a disease in which a shift has taken place in the process of
cell proliferation and differentiation. In most cases the cells can proliferate
excessively and form local tumours that can compress
or invade adjacent structure. Such neoplasms with the
characteristic of only local growth are termed benign.Neoplasm
with the additional characteristics of invasiveness and /or the capacity of
metastasis is classified as malignant. Above such tumour
stem cells can thus express colonogenic or
colony-forming capability. The invasive and metabolic processes as well as a
series of metabolic abnormalities resulting from cancer cause illness and
eventual death of the patient unless the neoplasm can be eradicated by the
above treatment.
REFERENCES:
1.
Rosenberg SA. Principles of Surgical Oncology. Cancer Principles and
Practices of Oncology. Philadelphia.
New York. 6th Edn.; 2001: 253.
2.
Landberg TG. Radiotherapy. Oxford Book of Technology. Oxford
University Press. Oxford. New York.
1995: 867
3.
Colvin OM. Antitumor alkylating agents.
Cancer Principles and Practices of Oncology. Philadelphia. New York. 6th
Edn; 2001: 363.
4.
Chu E. et.al. Antimetabolites. Cancer Principles and Practices of Oncology. Philadelphia. New York. 6th
Edn. 2001: 388.
5.
Haskell CM. Principles of Cancer chemotherapy – Plant
products. Cancer Treatment.
Philadelphia, New York. 5th Edn; 2001: 64
6.
Verweij J. et.al. Antitumor antibiotics. Cancer Chemotherapy and Biotherapy - Principles and
Practice. Philadelphia. USA. 3rd Edn; 2001: 373.
7.
Erlichman C and Loprinzi CL.
Hormonal therapies. Cancer Principles and Practices of Oncology. Philadelphia,
New York, 6th Edn. 2001: 388.
8.
Rosenberg SA. Biologic therapy. Cancer - Principles and Practices of
Oncology. Philadelphia. New York. 6th Edn;
2001: 36.
9.
Marks PA. and Dokmanovic
M. "Histone deacetylase
inhibitors: discovery and development as anticancer agents". Expert
opinion on investigational drugs. 14 (12); 2005: 1497–511.
10. http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/content/8/3/662.full.pdf
"Histone Deacetylase
Inhibitors: A New Class of Potential Therapeutic Agents for Cancer
Treatment" 2002
11. Monneret C. "Histone
deacetylase inhibitors for epigenetic therapy of
cancer". Anticancer Drugs. 18; 2007: 363–70.
12. Richon VM. et.al. "Histone deacetylase inhibitor
selectively induces p21WAF1 expression and gene-associated histone
acetylation". Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 97
(18); 2000: 10014–9.
13. Brehm A. et.al.
"Retinoblastoma protein recruits histone deacetylase to repress transcription". Nature. 391
(6667); 1998: 597–601.
14. Matsumura T. et al. "The deacetylase
HDAC1 negatively regulates the cardiovascular transcription factor Krüppel-like factor 5 through direct interaction". J.
Biol. Chem. 280 (13); 2005: 12123–9.
15. Zhang Z. et al. "Quantitation of HDAC1 mRNA expression in invasive carcinoma
of the breast*". Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 94 (1); 2005: 11–6.
16. Lövborg H. et.al. "Inhibition of proteasome activity, nuclear factor-Kappa B translocation
and cell survival by the antialcoholism drug disulfiram". International Journal of Cancer. 118 (6);
2006: 1577–80.
17. Wickström M. et al. "Pharmacological profiling of disulfiram using human tumor cell lines and human tumor
cells from patients". Biochemical Pharmacology 73 (1); 2007: 25–33.
18. Cvek B and Dvorak Z. "The value of proteasome inhibition in cancer. Can the old drug, disulfiram, have a bright new future as a novel proteasome inhibitor?”. Drug
Discovery Today. 13(15-16); 2008: 716–22.
19. Osanai K. et al. "A para-amino
substituent on the D-ring of green tea polyphenol
epigallocatechin-3-gallate as a novel proteasome
inhibitor and cancer cell apoptosis inducer". Bioorg.
Med. Chem. 15(15); 2007: 5076–82.
Received on 27.02.2011 Accepted on 20.05.2011
© Asian Pharma Press All
Right Reserved
Asian J. Pharm. Tech. 1(2): April-June 2011; Page 28-33